A study performed at the OECD Halden Reactor Project compared the effects o
f interface design and staffing levels on various aspects of team performan
ce. Teams of nuclear power plant operators participated in challenging simu
lator scenarios, working in either a simulated conventional plant, with a h
ard-control interface, or in a simulated advanced plant, with a computerize
d interface. Two-team staffing levels, normal and minimum, were evaluated i
n each plant condition. All teams participated in the same five study condi
tions, lasting 1-3 h each. Several measures assessed team performance: situ
ation awareness, workload, rated team interactions, rated overall performan
ce and objective performance. The findings revealed that combinations of in
terface design and staffing levels supported different aspects of performan
ce. Larger crews consistently performed better than smaller crews in the co
nventional plant. In the advanced plant, both crew types performed equally
well; however, smaller crews had better situation awareness than larger cre
ws. In general, performance was better for crews using the advanced plant i
nterface, but workload was higher. Workload also was consistently higher in
the smaller crews than in the larger crews, regardless of interface type.
Links between the performance measures were also noted.