Because of its computational efficiency, prestack Kirchhoff depth migration
is currently one of the most popular algorithms used in 2-D and 3-D subsur
face depth imaging. Nevertheless, Kirchhoff algorithms in their typical imp
lementation produce less than ideal results in complex terranes where multi
pathing from the surface to a given image point may occur, and beneath fast
carbonates, salt, or volcanics through which ray-theoretical energy cannot
penetrate to illuminate underlying slower-velocity sediments. To evaluate
the likely effectiveness of a proposed seismic-acquisition program, we coul
d perform a forward-modeling study, but this can be expensive. We show how
Kirchhoff modeling can be defined as the mathematical transpose of Kirchhof
f migration. The resulting Kirchhoff modeling algorithm has the same low co
mputational cost as Kirchhoff migration and, unlike expensive full acoustic
or elastic wave-equation methods, only models the events that Kirchhoff mi
gration can image.
Kirchhoff modeling is also a necessary element of constrained least-squares
Kirchhoff migration. We show how including a simple a priori constraint du
ring the inversion (that adjacent common-offset images should be similar) c
an greatly improve the resulting image by partially compensating for irregu
larities in surface sampling (including missing data), as well as for irreg
ularities in ray coverage due to strong lateral variations in velocity and
our failure to account for multipathing. By allowing unstacked common-offse
t gathers to become interpretable, the additional cost of constrained least
-squares migration may be justifiable for velocity analysis and amplitude-v
ariation-with-offset studies.
One useful by-product of least-squares migration is an image of the subsurf
ace illumination for each offset. If the data are sufficiently well sampled
(so that including the constraint term is not necessary), the illumination
can instead be calculated directly and used to balance the result of conve
ntional migration, obtaining most of the advantages of least-squares migrat
ion for only about twice the cost of conventional migration.