Gender, race, and perceived risk: the 'white male' effect

Citation
Ml. Finucane et al., Gender, race, and perceived risk: the 'white male' effect, HEALTH R SO, 2(2), 2000, pp. 159-172
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY
ISSN journal
13698575 → ACNP
Volume
2
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
159 - 172
Database
ISI
SICI code
1369-8575(200007)2:2<159:GRAPRT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Risks tend to be judged lower by men than by women and by white people than by people of colour. Prior research by Flynn, Slovic and Mertz [Risk Analy sis, 14, pp. 1101-1108] found that these race and gender differences in ris k perception in the United States were primarily due to 30% of the white ma le population who judge risks to be extremely low. The specificity of this finding suggests an explanation in terms of sociopolitical factors rather t han biological factors. The study reported here presents new data from a re cent national survey conducted in the United States. Although white males a gain stood apart with respect to their judgements of risk and their attitud es concerning worldviews, trust, and risk-related stigma, the results showe d that the distinction between white males and others is more complex than originally thought. Further investigation of sociopolitical factors in risk judgements is recommended to clarify gender and racial differences.