Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on nutrient digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fedsteers
Sa. Soto-navarro et al., Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on nutrient digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fedsteers, J ANIM SCI, 78(8), 2000, pp. 2215-2222
Nine crossbred beef steers (344+/-26 kg) fitted with ruminal cannulas were
used in a randomized complete block design to evaluate the effects of feedi
ng frequency and feed intake fluctuation on total tract digestion, digesta
kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fed steers. In Period
1, steers were allotted randomly to one of four dietary treatments: 1) feed
offered once daily at 0800; 2) feed offered once daily at 0800 with a 10%
fluctuation in day-to-day feed intake; 3) feed offered twice daily at 0800
and 1700; and 4) feed offered twice daily at 0800 and 1700 with a 10% fluct
uation in a day-to-day feed intake. In Period 2, steers were reallocated ac
ross treatments. The 90% concentrate diet was fed at 90% of the ad-libitum
consumption by each steer. Chromium-EDTA and Yb-labeled steam-flaked corn w
ere intraruminally infused at 0800 on d 1 and 3 and Co-EDTA and Er-labeled
steam-flaked corn were infused on d 2 and 4 of the 4-d collection period. R
uminal samples were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 h after the
0800 feeding, and total feces were collected for 4 d. Total tract digestib
ilities of OM, N, and starch were lowest (fluctuation x frequency, P <.05)
when feed was offered twice daily with a 10% fluctuation in intake. Ruminal
fluid volume and passage rate were not affected (P >.10) by feeding freque
ncy or intake fluctuation. A frequency x fluctuation x sampling time intera
ction occurred (P <.01) for ruminal pH. Steers fed a constant amount of fee
d once daily had higher (P <.05) ruminal pH at 0, 3, 18, and 24 h than stee
rs fed once daily with a 10% fluctuation in feed intake. Total VFA concentr
ation was greater (P <.01) at 9 h after the 0800 feeding when feed was offe
red once vs twice daily. Feeding twice daily increased (P <05) the molar pr
oportion of acetate and decreased (P <.05) the molar proportion of propiona
te. Increasing feeding frequency resulted in a more stable ruminal environm
ent; however, the increased acetate:propionate ratio with twice-daily feedi
ng might result in lower efficiency of energy utilization by limit-fed stee
rs.