Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam during cardiac surgery: Assessment of the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia
L. Barvais et al., Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam during cardiac surgery: Assessment of the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia, J CARDIOTHO, 14(4), 2000, pp. 402-408
Objective: To evaluate the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality
of anesthesia of pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and mi
dazolam designed to establish and maintain a plasma level of drug during ca
rdiac surgery.
Design: Prospective analysis.
Setting: Operating room at a university hospital.
Participants: Twenty adult patients younger than 75 years old scheduled for
valvular or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Interventions: Patients were anesthetized using a variable predicted concen
tration of sufentanil (1 to 10 ng/mL) combined with a stable predicted conc
entration of midazolam (100 ng/mL).
Measurements and Main Results: For each patient, arterial samples were take
n before (6 samples), during (2 samples), and after (2 samples) cardiopulmo
nary bypass (CPB). Plasma sufentanil and midazolam concentrations were meas
ured by specific radioimmunoassay and highperformance liquid chromatography
techniques. Predicted sufentanil and midazolam concentrations were derived
using the data sets of Gepts et al and Maitre et al. The predictive perfor
mance, the percentage prediction error (PE), and the absolute percentage er
ror were calculated for each sample. The bias, inaccuracy, and dispersion w
ere assessed by determining the median of the individual medians of the pre
diction errors (MDPE), the median of the individual median of the absolute
prediction errors (MDAPE), and the 10th and 90th percentiles of PE. For mid
azolam, the inaccuracy was low (MDAPE < 21%), but CPB was associated with a
dilution of the measured concentration associated with a negative bias. Fo
r sufentanil, the inaccuracy was also low before CPB (MDAPE = 18%) but incr
eased during and after CPB (MDAPE > 40%). During the whole procedure, the h
emodynamic control necessitated only a few interventions.
Conclusions Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazol
am using the pharmacokinetic sets of Gepts et al and Maitre et al is a safe
and accurate anesthetic technique before CPB in adult patients undergoing
cardiac surgery when high sufentanil (Ito 10 ng/mL) and low midazolam (100
ng/mL) predicted plasma concentrations are targeted. Copyright (C) 2000 by
W.B. Saunders Company.