BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is evidence that lauromacragols added to topical moi
sturizers and bath oils confer additional antipruritic efficacy, The mechan
ism for such an effect is not clearly established but lauromacragols may ac
t as local anaesthetics. We conducted two studies to determine whether the
clinical usage of a topical lauromacragol-containing product could influenc
e cutaneous innervation.
METHODS: Study I A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial was perfo
rmed in 16 healthy adult volunteers comparing Balneum-(R) (B) and Balneum p
lus(R) (BP) bath oils. Study 2 A randomized, double-blind, crossover study
was performed in 19 healthy adult volunteers comparing a topical lauromacra
gol-containing cream (Optiderm(R)) with placebo.
RESULTS: Study I A comparison of the weal, flare and blood flow (measured b
y laser Doppler flowmetry, LDF) before and after treatment demonstrated sig
nificantly smaller mean flare in the BP group following challenge with calc
itonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), Multivariate analysis also demonstrated
a significantly reduced LDF measurement in favour of the BP group. Study 2
The only treatment difference that achieved significance was a reduced fla
re size in favour of placebo after injection with 48/80.
CONCLUSION: Study 1 implies that although lauromacragols in EP might affect
neuronal control of the cutaneous microvasculature, the antipruritic effec
t claimed for Optiderm(R) does not appear to be due to cutaneous neuronal o
r microvascular influences.