It appears to be common wisdom that the basic cause of Thailand's crisis is
its extraordinarily weak financial institutions. The article questions thi
s proposition from an empirical viewpoint. It is well established that the
long-term performance of Thailand's financial system is favourable. The ins
ight from moral hazard indicators is unexpected regarding the bad banking p
roposition, although not compelling. Finally, the liberalisation process pr
oduced inadequately addressed risks. However this also applies to experienc
ed and well-regulated foreign banks. It is argued that the facts provided c
an be better explained in a framework of system change than by bad banking
in Thailand.