Ha. Dakik et Ms. Verani, Use of invasive and nuclear stress testing in patients with acute ischemiccoronary syndromes in a large, urban, university-affiliate hospital, J NUCL CARD, 7(4), 2000, pp. 328-332
Background Several recent studies have suggested a high use of invasive pro
cedures after acute myocardial infarction, without a corresponding improvem
ent in survival. We assessed the relative use of invasive procedures and nu
clear cardiac testing during acute coronary syndromes.
Methods and Results. We examined the in-hospital utilization rates of invas
ive and nuclear stress tests and their association with in-hospital mortali
ty in all patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome in a single
, university-affiliate hospital for 3 years.
The study cohort consisted of 1704 consecutive patients with acute myocardi
al infarction and 2414 patients with unstable angina pectoris, The utilizat
ion rate of nuclear stress testing was much lower than that of coronary ang
iography in patients with either acute myocardial infarction (11.9% vs 73.9
%, P < .001) or unstable angina (8.5% vs. 79.3%, P < .001), Patients examin
ed with nuclear stress testing, as compared with patients examined solely b
y means of coronary angiography, had lower revascularization and in-hospita
l mortality rates, both after acute myocardial infarction (29.2% vs 70%, P
< .001, and 1.5% vs 9.6%, P < .001, respectively) and unstable angina (14.6
% vs 80.6%, P < .001, and 1% vs 5.1%, P < .001, respectively), Revasculariz
ation guided by means of nuclear stress testing had a lower mortality rate
than that performed without the benefit of a nuclear test, both in patients
with acute myocardial infarction (0% vs 10.5%) and in patients with unstab
le angina (0% vs 5.9%).
Conclusion. Noninvasive stress imaging was used much less often than corona
ry angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes, The lower mortali
ty rate of patients examined with nuclear stress testing, compared with pat
ients examined solely by means of coronary angiography, deserves further st
udy, especially in patients undergoing revascularization.