This article presents a critique of communicative planning theory, especial
ly its consensus-based variation. Limitations in communicative planning the
ory are pinpointed. Consensus processes as practiced and theorized in thr U
nited Stares tend to be divorced from power, ro shun important issues. and
to result in general and thin agreements. Consensus processes also rely on
position-based and interest-based methods that overlook norms and meaning.
Finally, communicative planning theory has focussed on words and not images
-a severe shortcoming in a society where images exert a dominating influenc
e. Recent literatures on images are briefly examined, and a question about
the shape of a more rich and integrated theory of planning is posed.