We evaluated the after-hours support that radiologists could provide from t
heir homes to an urban hospital for reading emergency computerized tomograp
hy (CT) scans. During a six-month study period, 36 CT scans were acquired u
sing a video-capture card in a PC and transmitted via an ordinary telephone
line. The teleradiology interpretation and the formal report (from the har
d copy) were compared with a reference or gold standard interpretation made
by a radiologist and an emergency physician for 31 of the 36 cases. In com
parison with the gold standard, there were 26 correct diagnoses by teleradi
ology (84%) and five incorrect (16%). Head CT scans accounted for 74% of th
e transmitted scans and all five of the cases with discrepant diagnoses. Th
e cause of the single clinically relevant discrepancy was found to be unrel
ated to the use of teleradiology. In comparison with the formal report, the
accuracy of the teleradiologist was not significantly different for all ca
tegories combined or for head CT scans alone. Video-capture technology prov
ided a reliable means of transmitting CT scans for after-hours interpretati
on in emergency cases.