Estimating the parameters of aerobic function during exercise using an exponentially increasing work rate protocol

Citation
Y. Fukuba et al., Estimating the parameters of aerobic function during exercise using an exponentially increasing work rate protocol, MED BIO E C, 38(4), 2000, pp. 433-437
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Instrumentation & Measurement
Journal title
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
ISSN journal
01400118 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
433 - 437
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-0118(200007)38:4<433:ETPOAF>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A new exercise protocol has been proposed, with respect to cardiopulmonary exercise testing, which starts at a low work rate (WR) and increases expone ntially by a standard percentage of the previous work rate every minuter th e test is termed STEEP (standardised exponential exercise protocol). The po tential advantage of this protocol is that if can accommodate a wide range of subjects, since it allows a maximum to be attained with a relatively nar row variation of tolerance time, regardless of subjects exercise capacity T o date, only the (V) over dotO(2max) has been compared with that from the c urrent standard ramp protocol. The ramp, however, also allows other importa nt parameters of aerobic function to be estimated: the anaerobic threshold (AT); the response time constant and Delta(V) over dotO(2)/Delta WR. The ai m of this study was, therefore, to clarify whether these aerobic parameters can be readily discerned from the responses to the STEEP protocol both fro m a theoretical and practical viewpoint As a result of theoretical consider ations, we demonstrated that the (V) over dotO(2) time constant and Delta(V ) over dotO(2)/Delta WR may not both be estimated uniquely. As a practical expedient, a procedure was proposed for estimating the parameter analogues. The preliminary results for six subjects between the STEEP and ramp protoc ols showed consistent positive correlation for (V) over dotO(2max) (r = 0.9 97) and AT-(V) over dotO(2) (r = 0.980), whereas the correlation for the (V ) over dotO(2) time constant and Delta(V) over dotO(2)/Delta WR were not si gnificant. Further study is needed to clarify the reason(s) for the discrep ancies both from a theoretical and practical viewpoint.