Should there be more teaching of critical thinking in Australian general practice?

Authors
Citation
E. Mattes, Should there be more teaching of critical thinking in Australian general practice?, MED J AUST, 173(3), 2000, pp. 153-157
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
ISSN journal
0025729X → ACNP
Volume
173
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
153 - 157
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-729X(20000807)173:3<153:STBMTO>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
For clinicians such as GPs, critical thinking includes critical appraisal o f scientific evidence and the context of their clinical practice, and criti cal introspection. Largely due to a lack of rigorous research, there is no evidence that teach ing critical thinking or appraisal, at undergraduate or postgraduate levels , improves GPs' clinical performance or their patients' health. Before conducting such research, a systematic review of the available liter ature (largely in education and psychology) is warranted to assess the effi cacy of teaching critical thinking in non-medical environments. Critical thinking is being taught in Australian medical schools and will be introduced in the RACGP Training Program. However, it will be a while befo re this will have an impact in GPs' surgeries. The challenge will be to des ign an attractive CME program relevant to GPs while simultaneously evaluati ng its efficacy.