Vav family proteins couple to diverse cell surface receptors

Citation
Sl. Moores et al., Vav family proteins couple to diverse cell surface receptors, MOL CELL B, 20(17), 2000, pp. 6364-6373
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
02707306 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
17
Year of publication
2000
Pages
6364 - 6373
Database
ISI
SICI code
0270-7306(200009)20:17<6364:VFPCTD>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Vav proteins are guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rho family GTPases which activate pathways leading to actin cytoskeletal rearrangements and t ranscriptional alterations. Vav proteins contain several protein binding do mains which can link cell surface receptors to downstream signaling protein s. Vav1 is expressed exclusively in hematopoietic cells and tyrosine phosph orylated in response to activation of multiple cell surface receptors. Howe ver, it is not known whether the recently identified isoforms Vav2 and Vav3 , which are broadly expressed, can couple,vith similar classes of receptors , nor is it known whether all Vav isoforms possess identical functional act ivities. We expressed Vav1, Vav2, and Vav3 at equivalent levels to directly compare the responses of the Vav proteins to receptor activation. Although each Vav isoform was tyrosine phosphorylated upon activation of representa tive receptor tyrosine kinases, integrin, and lymphocyte antigen receptors, we found unique aspects of Vav protein coupling in each receptor pathway. Each Vav protein coprecipitated with activated epidermal growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors, and multiple phosphorylate d tyrosine residues on the PDGF receptor were able to mediate Vav2 tyrosine phosphorylation, Integrin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav proteins was net detected in nonhematopoietic cells unless the protein tyrosine kin ase Syk was also expressed, suggesting that integrin activation of Vav prot eins may be restricted to cell types that express particular tyrosine kinas es. In addition, we found that Vav1, but not Vav2 or Vav3, can efficiently cooperate with T-cell receptor signaling to enhance NFAT dependent transcri ption, while Vav1 and Vav3, but not Vav2, can enhance NF kappa B dependent transcription. Thus, although each Vav isoform can respond to similar cell surface receptors, there are isoform-specific differences in their activati on of downstream signaling pathways.