Csc. Lee et al., A COMPARISON OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL-EDUCATION SOFTWARE WITH A MORE TRADITIONAL TEACHING FORMAT, Teaching and learning in medicine, 9(2), 1997, pp. 111-115
Background: Computer-assisted instruction in medicine appears rofacili
tare learning, but it has not been compared prospectively to more trad
itional reaching methods. Purpose: To compare the efficacy of computer
-assisted instruction to a more traditional format in medical students
' acquisition of clinical acid-base problem-solving skills. Methods: 2
nd-year medical students at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of
Medicine (N = 82) were randomized into 2 groups. Thirty-seven received
computer-assisted instruction in acid-base problem-solving skills, an
d 45 were enrolled in a teacher-supervised workshop. Preinstruction an
d postinstruction questionnaires, as well as a 25-question test, were
administered to all students. Results: Analysis of the preinstruction
questionnaire demonstrated that the students' preferred method of lear
ning was the teacher supervised workshop (50%) followed by reading (39
.5%). Fifty-eight percent of the students did not use computers at all
. Of the remaining 42%, average computer use was 5.9 days per month. A
t the end of the course, both groups felt equally prepared for the tes
t. When asked, ''If you had a choice to team the material again, which
would you choose: workshop, reading, or computer-assisted instruction
?'' 93% of the supervised-workshop group chose the workshop, whereas 5
3% of the computer-assisted instruction group chose computer-assisted
instruction (p < .001). No significant difference between the groups w
as demonstrated in performance on postinstruction recall questions. We
did, however, find a significant difference favoring the workshop gro
up in postinstruction problem-solving skills (p = .04). Conclusions: C
omputer-assisted instruction can be as effective as a teacher-supervis
ed workshop in transmitting clinical acid-base knowledge skills to med
ical students. The students, however, do not appear inclined to rely s
olely on computer programs for learning and seem to benefit from teach
er-student interaction in learning problem-solving skills.