Diagnostic value of PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in clinical specimens from patients with erythema migrans and lyme neuroborreliosis

Citation
Am. Lebech et al., Diagnostic value of PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in clinical specimens from patients with erythema migrans and lyme neuroborreliosis, MOL DIAGN, 5(2), 2000, pp. 139-150
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS
ISSN journal
10848592 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
139 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
1084-8592(200006)5:2<139:DVOPFD>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of a 16S ribosomal RNA-based PCR on clinical specimens from patients with e rythema migrans (EM) and neuroborreliosis and to compare the sensitivities with those obtained by in vitro culture and serological testing. A semiquan titative detection system, representing the input amount of specific DNA an d thus the density of spirochetes in clinical specimens, indicated the pref erred clinical sample to obtain for PCR testing. Methods and Results: Skin biopsy and urine samples from 31 patients with EM and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine samples from 30 patients with neur oborreliosis were investigated. Borrelia burgdorferi DNA was detected in 71 % of the skin biopsy specimens and 13% of the urine samples from patients w ith EM. Forty-one percent of the patients with EM were found to have B burg dorferi-specific antibodies in serum, and B burgdorferi was cultured in 29% of the EM specimens. For patients with neuroborreliosis, the diagnostic se nsitivities in CSF and urine samples were 17% and 7%, respectively. Specifi c intrathecal antibody production was found in 90% of the patients, and 87% showed elevated B burgdorferi antibodies in serum. In general, PCR of skin biopsy samples yielded very high amounts of amplicons versus low amounts f or CSF and urine samples. Conclusions: PCR of skin biopsy specimens is currently the most sensitive a nd specific test for the diagnosis of patients with EM, superior to culture and serological testing. For B burgdorferi-specific CSF diagnosis in patie nts with neuroborreliosis, the measurement of specific intrathecal antibody synthesis is superior to PCR, However, in patients with a short duration o f disease (<14 days), PCR may be a useful diagnostic supplement. PCR of uri ne samples cannot be recommended at the present time for routine diagnosis of patients with EM or neuroborreliosis.