We outline a research program on solidarity in matches, i.e. durable social
relations between two or, to generalize slightly, a few parties. Examples
of matches include relations between natural persons such as households as
well as "corporate actors" such as research and development alliances, or b
uyer-supplier relations between firms. A typical feature of matches is that
the partners are interdependent with partly common and partly conflicting
interests. This interdependence induces risks. A paradigmatic risk and a cl
assical example of solidarity problems is that cooperation in matches is of
ten problematic: realizing the joint interests of the partners requires coo
peration which is problematic due to individual incentives for opportunism.
Trust problems are a typical case and the Prisoner's Dilemma is a well-kno
wn formal model of these risks. We discuss how rational, i.e. incentive-gui
ded and goal-directed actors cope with risks, or how they manage their matc
h. In particular, we highlight how the assumption of rational behavior, tog
ether with assumptions on the social embeddedness of matches and transactio
ns in matches, can be used to generate hypotheses on the management of coop
eration problems.