In February 1998 the New Zealand Government distributed the draft code of s
ocial and family responsibility as a public discussion document. The code a
ddressed eleven social issues and called for public responses to the docume
nt. In assuming the document constitutes political communication we have us
ed discourse analysis to examine its rhetoric in terms of practical ideolog
ies. Focussing on subject positioning, discourses and warranting devices we
identify the constraints of economic rationalist discourse in constructing
notions of social and family responsibility. We conclude that the code rel
ies on individualised constructions of social problems and their solutions.