Background. Lay personnel and many health care workers in the United States
believe that head louse infestations caused by Pediculus capitis are excee
dingly transmissible and that infested children readily infest others. Scho
olchildren therefore frequently become ostracized and remain so until no si
gns of their presumed infestations are evident. Repeated applications of pe
diculicidal product and chronic school absenteeism frequently result.
Methods. To determine how frequently louse-related exclusions from schools
and applications of pediculicidal therapeutic regimens might be inappropria
te, we invited health care providers as well as nonspecialized personnel to
submit specimens to us that were associated with a diagnosis of pediculias
is, Each submission was then characterized microscopically.
Results, Health care professionals as well as nonspecialists frequently ove
rdiagnose pediculiasis capitis and generally fail to distinguish active fro
m extinct infestations. Noninfested children thereby become quarantined at
least as often as infested children. Traditional anti-louse formulations ar
e overapplied as frequently as are "alternative" formulations. Pediculicida
l treatments are more frequently applied to noninfested children than to ch
ildren who bear active infestations.
Conclusions. Pediculicidal treatments should be applied solely after living
nymphal or adult lice or apparently viable eggs have been observed. Becaus
e health care providers as well as lay personnel generally misdiagnose pedi
culiasis, and because few symptoms and no direct infectious processes are k
nown to result, we suggest that the practice of excluding presumably infest
ed children from school may be more burdensome than the infestations themse
lves.