Do. Rosenberry et Tc. Winter, DYNAMICS OF WATER-TABLE FLUCTUATIONS IN AN UPLAND BETWEEN 2 PRAIRIE-POTHOLE WETLANDS IN NORTH-DAKOTA, Journal of hydrology, 191(1-4), 1997, pp. 266-289
Data from a string of instrumented wells located on an upland of 55 m
width between two wetlands In central North Dakota, USA, indicated fre
quent changes in water-table configuration following wet and dry perio
ds during 5 years of investigation, A seasonal wetland is situated abo
ut 1.5 m higher than a nearby semipermanent wetland, suggesting an ave
rage ground water-table gradient of 0.02. However, water had the poten
tial to flow as ground water from the upper to the lower wetland durin
g only a few instances, A water-table trough adjacent to the lower sem
ipermanent wetland was the most common water-table configuration durin
g the first 4 years of the study, but it is likely that severe drought
during those years contributed to the longevity and extent of the wat
er-table trough, Water-table mounds that formed In response to rainfal
l events caused reversals of direction of flow that frequently modifie
d the more dominant water-table trough during the severe drought. Rapi
d and large water-table rise to near land surface in response to inten
se rainfall was aided by the thick capillary fringe. One of the wettes
t summers on record ended the severe drought during the last year of t
he study, and caused a larger-scale water-table mound to form between
the two wetlands. The mound was short in duration because it was overw
helmed by rising stage of the higher seasonal wetland which spilled in
to the lower wetland. Evapotranspiration was responsible for generatin
g the water-table trough that formed between the two wetlands, Estimat
ion of evapotranspiration based on diurnal fluctuations in wells yield
ed rates that averaged 3-5 mm day(-1). On many occasions water levels
in wells closer to the semipermanent wetland indicated a direction of
Bow that was different from the direction indicated by water levels in
wells farther from the wetland. Misinterpretation of direction and ma
gnitude of gradients between ground water and wetlands could result fr
om poorly placed or too few observation wells, and also from infrequen
t measurement of water levels in wells.