As the public becomes increasingly aware that safety is a health-related is
sue, more stringent requirements have now been placed on manufacturers' pro
ducts so as to limit injuries to people from these products. Therefore, a p
roduct's quality is now no longer measured solely in terms of aesthetic, co
mfort, and durability, but increasingly, in terms of its injury mitigating
features. In the Auto Industry for example, safety has become the major fac
tor driving the design of new vehicles. Innovative safety concepts are cont
inuously sought after and evolved by safety engineers to forestall crash (c
rash avoidance design concepts), reduce injury when crash does occur (vehic
le crashworthiness), and to protect occupants and pedestrians from flames a
nd other hazards after crash (postcrash protection design concepts). The ob
jective of this paper is to provide a perspective of the evolution of autom
otive safety in the United States and also take a peek at global future tre
nds. In addition, this paper shows how innovative safety concepts are not o
nly shaping vehicle design but also changing the rigid definition of vehicl
e quality. Practical examples of evolutions of innovative safety concepts t
hrough the processes of Inventive Engineering are presented in the area of
vehicle crash engineering. Concepts constraints are briefly reviewed as rel
ated to their design contradictions to comfort quality and safety quality.
The focus is on Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Dynamic Side Impact (DSI) r
egulatory requirements. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.