The objective was to evaluate digital images of the retina from a handheld
fundus camera (Nidek NM-100) for suitability in telemedicine screening of d
iabetic retinopathy. A handheld fundus camera (Nidek) and a standard fundus
camera (Zeiss) were used to photograph 49 eyes from 25 consecutive patient
s attending our diabetic clinic. One patient had cataracts, making it impos
sible to get a quality image of one of the eyes (retina). The Nidek images
were digitized, compressed, and stored in a Fujix DF-10M digitizer supplied
with the camera. The digital images and the photographs were presented sep
arately in a random order to three ophthalmologists. The quality of the ima
ges was ranked as good, acceptable or unacceptable for diabetic retinopathy
diagnosis. The images were also evaluated for the presence of microaneurys
ms, blot hemorrhages, exudates, fibrous tissue, previous photocoagulation,
and new vessel formation. kappa Values were computed for agreement between
the photographs and digital images. Overall agreement between the photograp
hs and digital images was poor (kappa < 0.30). On average, only 24% of the
digital images were graded as being good quality and 56% as having an accep
table quality. However, 93% of the photographs were graded as good-quality
images for diagnosis. The results indicate that the digital images from the
handheld fundus camera may not be suitable for diagnosis of diabetic retin
opathy. The images shown on the liquid crystal display (LCD) screen of the
camera were of good quality. However, the images produced by the digitizer
(Fujix DF-10M) attached to the camera were not as good as the images shown
on the LCD screen. A better digitizing system may produce better quality im
ages from the Nidek camera.