Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera

Citation
K. Yogesan et al., Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera, TELEMED J, 6(2), 2000, pp. 219-223
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL
ISSN journal
10783024 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
219 - 223
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-3024(200022)6:2<219:TSODRU>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate digital images of the retina from a handheld fundus camera (Nidek NM-100) for suitability in telemedicine screening of d iabetic retinopathy. A handheld fundus camera (Nidek) and a standard fundus camera (Zeiss) were used to photograph 49 eyes from 25 consecutive patient s attending our diabetic clinic. One patient had cataracts, making it impos sible to get a quality image of one of the eyes (retina). The Nidek images were digitized, compressed, and stored in a Fujix DF-10M digitizer supplied with the camera. The digital images and the photographs were presented sep arately in a random order to three ophthalmologists. The quality of the ima ges was ranked as good, acceptable or unacceptable for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis. The images were also evaluated for the presence of microaneurys ms, blot hemorrhages, exudates, fibrous tissue, previous photocoagulation, and new vessel formation. kappa Values were computed for agreement between the photographs and digital images. Overall agreement between the photograp hs and digital images was poor (kappa < 0.30). On average, only 24% of the digital images were graded as being good quality and 56% as having an accep table quality. However, 93% of the photographs were graded as good-quality images for diagnosis. The results indicate that the digital images from the handheld fundus camera may not be suitable for diagnosis of diabetic retin opathy. The images shown on the liquid crystal display (LCD) screen of the camera were of good quality. However, the images produced by the digitizer (Fujix DF-10M) attached to the camera were not as good as the images shown on the LCD screen. A better digitizing system may produce better quality im ages from the Nidek camera.