Analysis of bacterial community in membrane-separation bioreactors by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques

Citation
Bs. Luxmy et al., Analysis of bacterial community in membrane-separation bioreactors by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques, WATER SCI T, 41(10-11), 2000, pp. 259-268
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
02731223 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
10-11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
259 - 268
Database
ISI
SICI code
0273-1223(2000)41:10-11<259:AOBCIM>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The bacterial communities of membrane-separation bioreactors (MBR) fed with raw sewage were analyzed by a pilot scale study. The community was analyze d by both Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) and PCR-DGGE (polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) techniques. Five r RNA targeted group specific oligonucleotide probes showed that the alpha- a nd beta- subclasses of proteobacteria were the most dominant groups among t hem. The identification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in MBR was confirmed by three probes: NEU, Nsv 443 and Nso 190. Mostly the ammonia-oxidizers wer e found in groups and present in the form of clusters or aggregates. The ra tio of NEU/EUB was estimated by double hybridization and image analysis tec hniques as 6%. The Nitrobacter sp. was also identified inside the MBR with the help of a NIT3 probe and they were also found to be present in the form of a cluster. Usually the clusters formed by the Nitrobacter sp. were smal ler than those of ammonia-oxidizing groups. After numerical analysis on the band pattern of DGGE, it was found that the MBR bacterial communities were different from that of conventional activated sludge (CAS) communities wit h dissimilarity indexes more than 0.6. The diversity of the microbial commu nity was estimated by the Shannon-Weaver index of general diversity. It was found that the value of the diversity index for the CAS process was 1.61 w hile those for two MBR processes were 1.68 and 1.59.