Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome - Fifty-one consecutive patients treated by maxillofacial surgery

Citation
G. Bettega et al., Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome - Fifty-one consecutive patients treated by maxillofacial surgery, AM J R CRIT, 162(2), 2000, pp. 641-649
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1073449X → ACNP
Volume
162
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
641 - 649
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(200008)162:2<641:OSAS-F>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The place of surgical treatment in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) remains unclear. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) has a response rate of 41 % overall and only 5% when retrolingual narrowing is present. Thus, in case s with suspected hypopharyngeal collapse maxillofacial surgery has been pro posed with improved results. The Stanford group has designed a step-by-step surgical procedure tailored to the specific anatomical abnormalities encou ntered in each patient. The goal is to avoid a full maxillomandibular advan cement osteotomy (MMO), at least in a subgroup of patients, beginning with a limited mandibular osteotomy (with or without hyoid myotomy and hyothyroi dopexy and with or without UPPP) (phase 1 surgery). In this procedure MMO i s performed as the second or third step (phase 2 surgery). The present stud y reports on our prospective experience with 51 consecutive patients (64 su rgical procedures) treated by the step-by-step maxillofacial surgery previo usly described by the Stanford team, Only 2 of the 53 patients initially tr eated were lost for follow-up, Surgery was considered a success if the post operative apnea and hypopnea index (AHI) was less than 15/h with at least a 50% reduction. Forty-four patients had phase 1 surgery. The success rate w as 22.7% (10 of 44). The mean AHI was unchanged with a trend for reduction in the apnea index. Twenty patients had maxillomandibular advancement surge ry (phase 2) (13 failures of phase 1, 7 patients primarily because of facio skeletal deformities). The AHI decreased from 59 +/- 29/h to 11 +/- 9/h aft er phase 2. Of the patients 75% (15 of 20) were considered to have had a su ccessful outcome. In conclusion, phase 1 does not seem effective in most pa tients with OSAS. The results of phase 2 surgery are successful in young pa tients with severe OSAS even if the surgical technique is more aggressive.