Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery - A randomized, controlled trial
Hm. Arthur et al., Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery - A randomized, controlled trial, ANN INT MED, 133(4), 2000, pp. 253-262
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: In publicly funded health care systems, a waiting period for su
ch services as coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is common. The p
ossibility of using the waiting period to improve patient outcomes should b
e investigated.
Objective: To examine the effect of a multidimensional preoperative interve
ntion on presurgery and postsurgery outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting
elective CABG.
Design: Randomized, controlled trial.
Setting: A regional cardiovascular surgery center in a tertiary care hospit
al, southwestern Ontario, Canada.
Patients: 249 patients on a waiting list for elective CABG whose surgeries
were scheduled for a minimum of 10 weeks from the time of study recruitment
.
Intervention: During the waiting period, the treatment group received exerc
ise training twice per week, education and reinforcement, and monthly nurse
-initiated telephone calls. After surgery, participation in a cardiac rehab
ilitation program was offered to all patients.
Measurements: Postoperative length of stay was the primary outcome, seconda
ry outcomes were exercise performance, general health-related quality of li
fe, social support, anxiety, and utilization of health care services.
Results: Length of stay differed significantly between groups. Patients who
received the preoperative intervention spent 1 less day [95% CI, 0.0 to 1.
0 day] in the hospital overall (P = 0.002) acid less time in the intensive
care unit (median, 2.1 hours [CI, -1.2 to 16 hours]; P = 0.001). During the
waiting period, patients in the intervention group had a better quality of
life than controls. Improved quality of life continued up to 6 months afte
r surgery. Mortality rates did not differ.
Conclusion: The waiting period for elective procedures, such as CABG, may b
e used to enhance in-hospital and early-phase recovery, improving patients'
functional abilities and quality of life while reducing their hospital sta
y.