Outcome of patients with ventricular assist devices and acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy

Citation
B. Kaltenmaier et al., Outcome of patients with ventricular assist devices and acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, ASAIO J, 46(3), 2000, pp. 330-333
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
ASAIO JOURNAL
ISSN journal
10582916 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
330 - 333
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-2916(200005/06)46:3<330:OOPWVA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
The significance of acute renal failure (ARF) for patients treated with a v entricular assist device (VAD) is uncertain. There is little information on the outcome of patients who require renal replacement therapy during treat ment with a VAD. A retrospective review was undertaken to evaluate the impa ct of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on such patients. S tudied were 227 patients who were supplied with a VAD at the German Heart I nstitute Berlin. Fifty-five patients required renal replacement therapy dur ing treatment with a VAD. These were compared with patients not needing ren al replacement therapy (ARF and non-ARF groups). Significant differences fo r the end points of survival, heart transplantation, and discharge from hos pital were observed in patients with ARF (p < 0.01). Survival was then anal yzed according to indications for treatment with a VAD (bridge to transplan tation or cardiac recovery after cardiotomy, transplantation, myocardial in farction, myocarditis, and endocarditis). Survival for bridge-to-transplant ation patients was clearly influenced in a negative way by ARF (p < 0.01). For cardiac recovery patients, only a small difference in survival was obse rved (p = 0.05). We conclude that ARF is a negative predictor for bridge-to -transplantation patients. for cardiac recovery patients the impact of ARF on survival is marginally significant.