B. Kaltenmaier et al., Outcome of patients with ventricular assist devices and acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, ASAIO J, 46(3), 2000, pp. 330-333
The significance of acute renal failure (ARF) for patients treated with a v
entricular assist device (VAD) is uncertain. There is little information on
the outcome of patients who require renal replacement therapy during treat
ment with a VAD. A retrospective review was undertaken to evaluate the impa
ct of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on such patients. S
tudied were 227 patients who were supplied with a VAD at the German Heart I
nstitute Berlin. Fifty-five patients required renal replacement therapy dur
ing treatment with a VAD. These were compared with patients not needing ren
al replacement therapy (ARF and non-ARF groups). Significant differences fo
r the end points of survival, heart transplantation, and discharge from hos
pital were observed in patients with ARF (p < 0.01). Survival was then anal
yzed according to indications for treatment with a VAD (bridge to transplan
tation or cardiac recovery after cardiotomy, transplantation, myocardial in
farction, myocarditis, and endocarditis). Survival for bridge-to-transplant
ation patients was clearly influenced in a negative way by ARF (p < 0.01).
For cardiac recovery patients, only a small difference in survival was obse
rved (p = 0.05). We conclude that ARF is a negative predictor for bridge-to
-transplantation patients. for cardiac recovery patients the impact of ARF
on survival is marginally significant.