The data from the surveys by Franx et al. (1989), Peletier et al. (1990), G
oudfrooij et al. (1994a), completed by our own measurements, have been used
to build a sample of ellipticals with the full array of U-B, B-V, B-K and
V-I colours, and corresponding gradients. A number of objects with data for
only 3 colours are also considered. Photometric profiles were re-calibrate
d in a coherent colours system, and a seemingly successful attempt was made
to improve gradients by minor corrections to adopted sky background values
.
"External" probable errors are obtained for the revised data by comparisons
between the various sources. These have poor statistical weight in U-B and
V-I.
An ad hoc "standard" gradient Delta(s) is defined as a weighted average of
the four gradients in the above listed colours (or only three). The correla
tions of the various gradients to a, are considered, and their slopes Delta
(U-B)/Delta(s),... are compared to the corresponding calculated ratios for
current hypothesis regarding the origin of colour gradients in ellipticals,
i.e. population gradients and large scale dust distributions. Both the rat
ios for the U-B and V-I colours are not compatible with the explanation in
terms of diffuse dust but tend to agree with the explanation in terms of me
tallicity variations.
The correlation between the gradient Delta(U-B) and the standard one Delta(
s) might be worse than could be explained by observational errors. Both pop
ulation variations and possibly complex dust distributions should be invoke
d to explain the complications of colour gradients.