Identification and typing of Pasteurella multocida: a review

Citation
Pj. Blackall et Jk. Miflin, Identification and typing of Pasteurella multocida: a review, AVIAN PATH, 29(4), 2000, pp. 271-287
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
AVIAN PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
03079457 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
271 - 287
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-9457(200008)29:4<271:IATOPM>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Pasteurella multocida is an important pathogen of many avian species. This review critically examines recent developments in new-generation tests for the identification and typing of this bacterium. Two polymerase chain react ion (PCR) tests have been reported for P. multocida. Both tests show promis e as diagnostic tests that could be considered for routine use. However, th ere have not yet been effective evaluation studies that examine the ability of these new tests to distinguish between P. multocida, both typical and a typical isolates, and the range of other P. multocida-like organisms found in avian species. One PCR, reported by Townsend et al. (Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36, 1096-1100), has been the more fully evaluated and is the better choice, at this stage, for laboratories considering the use of PCR technology for detection of P. multocida. An important point is that the PC R tests have been validated by use on pure cultures or enrichment broths - not on direct examination of body tissues. To date, there have been five di fferent technologies used to type avian P. multocida: restriction endonucle ase analysis (REA), ribotyping, pulsed field gel electrophoresis, repetitiv e extragenic palindromic-PCR (REP-PCR) and multi-locus enzyme electrophores is (MLEE). The methodology underlying these techniques is briefly explained and the performance of these techniques with regards to the typing of avia n P. multocida is critically examined. For smaller laboratories that are in vestigating outbreaks of fowl cholera, it would appear that REA and REP-PCR are the typing methods of choice. For central reference laboratories that are considering studies of large collections of isolates, MLEE supported by two of the other methods would appear the most suitable techniques.