Fa. Mcalister et al., When should hypertension be treated? The different perspectives of Canadian family physicians and patients, CAN MED A J, 163(4), 2000, pp. 403-408
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Hypertension guidelines from different organizations often spec
ify different treatment thresholds, and none explicitly state how these thr
esholds were chosen. This study was undertaken to determine the treatment t
hresholds of family physicians and hypertensive patients for mild, uncompli
cated essential hypertension. A subject's treatment threshold can be determ
ined by eliciting the minimum reduction in cardiovascular risk that he or s
he feels outweighs the inconvenience, costs and side effects of antihyperte
nsive therapy (the minimal clinically important difference [MCID]).
Methods: The study subjects consisted of a random sample of family physicia
ns and a consecutive sample of hypertensive patients without overt cardiova
scular disease from Ottawa and Edmonton. To determine participants' MCIDs,
we used a survey employing hypothetical scenarios teach depicting a differe
nt baseline cardiovascular risk) and a probability trade-off tool.
Results: Of 94 family physicians and 146 patients approached for the study,
72 and 74 participated respectively. There was marked variability in the M
CIDs of both groups. In general, patients were less likely to want antihype
rtensive therapy than physicians, particularly when baseline cardiovascular
risks were low: 49% v. 64% (p = 0.06), 68% v. 92% (p < 0.001) and 86% v. 1
00% (p = 0.001) for 5-year cardiovascular risks of 2%, 5% and 10% respectiv
ely. Moreover, patients expressed larger MCIDs (i.e., wanted greater benefi
ts before accepting therapy) than physicians. However, a subgroup of patien
ts (15% to 26%, depending on the scenario) wanted treatment even if there w
as no anticipated benefit. Multivariate analysis showed that no sociodemogr
aphic factors strongly predicted the MCIDs of either group.
Interpretation: Guidelines that set treatment thresholds on the basis of ph
ysician or expert opinion may nor accurately reflect the preferences of hyp
ertensive patients. There is a need for patient decision aids and attention
to patient preferences when initiation of antihypertensive therapy is cons
idered for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Further research is ne
eded to define treatment thresholds for other chronic conditions and in oth
er groups.