Study objectives: To understand the theory and results of how to improve ph
ysician performance, as part of overall health-care quality improvement. In
particular to study whether and how guideline production and dissemination
affects physician performance.
Design: Review of meta-analyses and structured reviews; review of behavior
change theories implicit in interventions to change physician performance.
Setting: Primarily the United States.
Patients or participants: Various patients and physicians, determined by re
views.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and results: There is no unifying theory of physician behavior
change tested among physicians in practice. Attempts to affect individual
physicians' performance have often met with failure. Mixed results are foun
d for almost all interventions reviewed, Multiple interventions yield bette
r results.
Conclusions: The answer to the question of what works to improve an individ
ual physician's clinical performance is not simple, Emerging theory and evi
dence suggests that applications of behavior-change methods should not be f
ocused on which tools (don't) always work. Instead, guideline development a
nd implementation methods should be theory driven and evidence based (suppo
rted by evidence that proves the theory correct). In particular, the framew
ork of evidence-based quality assessment offers some insight into past fail
ures and offers hope for organizing attempts at guideline implementation.