The declining prevalence of left-handed individuals with increasing age has
led to two main avenues of hypotheses; the association is due either (1) t
o a birth cohort effect and/or an age effect caused by a switch to right-ha
ndedness with advancing age or (2) to mortality selection that reduces surv
ival in left-handed individuals, or both. It is uncertain whether a cohort
or age effect can explain the decline in age-related prevalence, and confli
cting evidence exists in favor of the mortality hypothesis. We compared mor
tality in a subgroup of 118 opposite handed twin pairs by counting in how m
any instances the right-handed twin died first. There was no evidence of di
fferential survival between right-handed and non-right handed individuals i
n the entire 1900-1910 cohort. With respect to the number of right-handed t
wins who died first, there was no material disadvantage among those who wer
e not right-handed. In 60% (95% confidence interval = 49.0-71.5%) of dizygo
tic pairs, the right-handed twins died first. In 50% of monozygotic pairs,
right-handed twins died first. The prevalence of not being right handed was
higher among males (9.2%) than females (6.5%); there was a similar frequen
cy of non right-handedness in monozygotic (8.0%) and dizygotic (7.8%) twins
. We did not find evidence of excess mortality among non-right-handed adult
twins in this follow up study.