This article describes a qualitative investigation of 20 student activists'
resolutions to environmental dilemmas. Participants responded to an oral i
nterview asking them to resolve 6 dilemmas involving the natural environmen
t and to give justifications for their resolutions. Several major themes em
erged. First, participants tended to be concerned with maintaining human se
lf-determination and tolerating human diversity. They also resolved dilemma
s by reference to 3rd parties, and attributions of responsibility and sacri
fice were made according to several patterns. Both humans and nonhumans wer
e considered in resolutions, and resolutions reflected concerns with proced
ural justice and fairness and context-based value hierarchies. These themes
are discussed in terms of the difficulty of resolving such dilemmas and im
plications for studying values and moral choices in the environmental conte
xt.