Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and sa
fety of a new prostatic stent (Trestle(R), Boston Scientific Microvasive) f
or the treatment of BPH in patients with complete urinary retention and con
sidered to be inoperable.
Methods: The efficacy of the stent was evaluated in terms of return of mict
urition, level of patient satisfaction, uroflowmetry and residual urine. An
y stents removed were examined by infrared spectrophotometry for the presen
ce of crystalline encrustations.
Results: From December 1997 to April 1999, 20 stents were inserted under lo
cal anaesthesia in 17 patients aged 54-90 years. Stents remained in place f
or an average of 3.5 months. Two migrations were reported. The mean maximum
flow rate was 13.7 ml/s and the mean residual urine was 110 mi. The infrar
ed spectrophotometry study revealed a glycoprotein film on stents in place
for 1-6 months, accompanied by uric acid crystals on stents in place for 9
months.
Conclusion: The Trestle prostatic stent is effective and constitutes a good
alternative to surgical treatment in patients with a high operative risk.
Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.