Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis

Authors
Citation
Ds. Goodin, Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis, EXPERT OP I, 9(4), 2000, pp. 655-670
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
ISSN journal
13543784 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
655 - 670
Database
ISI
SICI code
1354-3784(200004)9:4<655:TDIMS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Recently there have been considerable advances made in the treatment of mul tiple sclerosis. For the first time since its initial clinical description in the 1800s, there are now available several medications which unequivocal ly exert favourable clinical effects through the lowering of the biological activity of die human illness. The therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta prepar ations seems particularly well established in this regard on the basis of f ive large, independent, trials of this agent. These: trials have demonstrat ed remarkably consistent reductions in both attack rates and disability lev els using a combination of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome measures. The therapeutic benefit of glatiramer acetate also has been well established, although there is less available data on this agent than there is for interferon. It is important to recognise, however, that, although t hese agents represent an important first step in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis, they are only partial therapies. In order to actu ally cure the illness or even to substantially improve patient outcome pie need considerably better agents than we have currently. Nevertheless, it is likely that, with improved knowledge of the role that interferon beta play s in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and with better understanding o f the mechanism by which glatiramer acetate exerts its therapeutic: effect, greatly improved therapeutic agents will be available in the future. In ad dition, it seems likely that, in the future (by analogy to the experience i n oncology), we will begin utilising combinations of therapies in order to better control it the biological activity of this debilitating disease. Suc h combination therapy well almost certainly include combinations of partial ly effective agents as well as combinations of these agents with other medi cations (e.g., the immunosuppressive drugs) which, by themselves, have only been demonstrated tu exert marginal clinical benefits on the course of ill ness. Moreover, it also seems likely that, increasingly, therapeutic strate gies that enhance or promote myelin repair will become a major focus of cli nical research in this area.