Sm. Childs et al., The management of Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care: a systematic review of the literature, FAM PRACT, 17, 2000, pp. S6-S11
Objective. The aim of the present study was to provide evidence from the li
terature to inform the production of guidelines by the European Society for
Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG) for the management of Helicobacter p
ylori infection in primary care.
Methods. A systematic review was conducted, searching MEDLINE, EM BASE and
the Cochrane Library. The systematic review was designed to answer a number
of questions: the role of H.pylori in the aetiology of peptic ulcer diseas
e (PUD), gastric cancer (GC), non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and oesophagitis; n
on-invasive testing for H.pylori and post-treatment testing; eradication th
erapy; and cost issues. Selection of records concentrated on the highest qu
ality studies, i.e. systematic reviews, meta-analyses and cost analyses.
Results. Helicobacter pylori infection is a causal factor in PUD and GC but
not in NUD or oesophagitis. Serological tests and urea breath tests (UBTs)
can be used for the detection of H.pylori, but UBT is the preferred choice
for post-treatment testing. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)based triple regime
ns are the preferred eradication therapy. Eradication therapy is more cost-
effective than long-term maintenance therapy.
Conclusions. Strong evidence is available for answering questions on the ae
tiology of stomach ulcers and GU, eradication therapies and cost issues. We
aker evidence is available for answering the questions on the aetiology of
NUD and non-invasive testing. No evidence is available for answering the qu
estion on the role of H.pylori in the aetiology of oesophagitis.