H. Asai et T. Takahashi, Influence of the grain boundary phase on the mechanical strength at aluminum nitride substrate surfaces, IEEE T AD P, 23(3), 2000, pp. 452-460
The influence of grain boundary phases on the mechanical strength at alumin
um nitride (ALN) substrate surfaces, after a wet chemical process, was stud
ied using AIN substrates doped with 2 wt% CaO or 4 wt% Y2O3. Mechanical str
ength was measured by pin pull-off, pin bending tests and Vickers hardness
measurements, Test specimens were obtained by the processes of lapping, pol
ishing, thin-film metallizing, photoengraving, plating, and brazing, The te
st results showed that the mechanical strength at the surface of Y2O3-AlN s
ubstrates was higher than at CaO-AlN surfaces, where it was under the adhes
ion strength between the metallization layer and the AIN substrate. The mec
hanical strength at the surface of the CaO-AlN substrate was lost during pa
tterning and plating. This was accompanied by an important weight loss in H
NO3 and K2O . n(B2O3) aqueous solution, due to dissolution of the grain bou
ndary phase, The reason for the difference in the mechanical surface streng
th of AIN substrates after patterning and plating is that the CaO-AlN grain
boundary phase dissolves in the chemical solution in the process more easi
ly than the Y2O3-AlN grain boundary phase. The Y2O3 -AlN substrate showed u
nchanged pin pull-off and bending strength even after thermal cycling (1000
cycles) and 1000 h of a pressure cooker test. Although the CaO-AlN grain b
oundary phase seemed to cover all the grains, thermal conductivity was only
slightly affected, because the grain boundary film was very thin.