Eh. Hernes et al., EPIRUBICIN COMBINED WITH ESTRAMUSTINE PHOSPHATE IN HORMONE-RESISTANT PROSTATE-CANCER - A PHASE-II STUDY, British Journal of Cancer, 76(1), 1997, pp. 93-99
Twenty-four assessable patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer
(HRPC) were to receive daily doses of oral estramustine phosphate (EM
P), 10 mg kg(-1), and intravenous epirubicin (EPR) infusions, 100 mg m
(-2), every third week up to a cumulative dose of 500 mg m(-2). Bioche
mical response [greater than or equal to 50% reduction in pretreatment
serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after three cycles of greater t
han or equal to 3 weeks' duration] was demonstrated in 13 of 24 patien
ts included (54%). No objective response (WHO criteria) was observed,
although seven of nine evaluable patients achieved a greater than or e
qual to 50% serum PSA reduction. Subjective improvement (pain score, p
erformance status) occurred in 7 of 24 patients, whereas nine patients
progressed subjectively. There was no correlation between subjective
and biochemical response. Biochemical progression (greater than or equ
al to 50% increase of nadir PSA) occurred after a median of 12 weeks.
All but two patients were alive after a median follow-up time of 8.7 m
onths for surviving patients (range 3.3-13.2). Eight patients experien
ced grade 3/4 leucopenia, with no indication of cumulative myelosuppre
ssion. Cardiovascular toxicity was experienced by four patients. Two p
atients developed angioedema twice, in one patient requiring hospitali
zation at the intensive ward. Based on this limited series, the combin
ation of EPR and EMP in patients with HRPC is tolerable and appears to
be effective in terms of significant PSA reduction. The results warra
nt further investigations of the two drugs and, in particular, of the
clinical significance of greater than or equal to 50% PSA decrease in
patients with HRPC.