Comparative immunoreactivity of anti-trifluoroacetyl (TFA) antibody and anti-lipoic acid antibody in primary biliary cirrhosis: Searching for a mimic

Citation
M. Sasaki et al., Comparative immunoreactivity of anti-trifluoroacetyl (TFA) antibody and anti-lipoic acid antibody in primary biliary cirrhosis: Searching for a mimic, J AUTOIMMUN, 15(1), 2000, pp. 51-60
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY
ISSN journal
08968411 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
51 - 60
Database
ISI
SICI code
0896-8411(200008)15:1<51:CIOA(A>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Previous studies documenting the existence of cross-reactivity between the lipoated (but not unlipoated) forms of the inner lipoyl domain (E2L2) of PD C-E2 [the major autoantigen in Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)] and trifluo roacetylated (TFA) proteins, led us to hypothesize that PBC may be due to a n initial insult with an environmental agent that cross-reacts with TFA. Th erefore, we performed a comparative study of the reactivity of rabbit anti- TFA antibody and anti-lipoic acid (LA) antibody against the mitochondrial a utoantigens of human PBC and various TFA and LA conjugated proteins. Wherea s both anti-TFA and anti-LA reacted with PDC-E2, the wild-type lipoated for m of E2L2, OGDC-E2 E3-BP and LA-KLH, neither reacted with BCOADC-E2 or the non-lipoated form of E2L2. Of interest was that while anti-TFA reacted with PDC-E2, TFA-RSA and LA-KLH, it failed to inhibit PDC-E2 enzyme function. I n contrast, anti-LA demonstrated cytoplasmic and mitochondrial staining, an d inhibited PDC enzyme activity. Hence, although considerable cross reactiv ity exists between anti-TFA and anti-LA, the molecular nature of the intera ction is clearly different. One of 14 PBC sera reacted weakly with TPA-albu min, whereas four of 14 PBC sera reacted with LA-KLH. Immunohistochemically , both anti-TFA and anti-LA antibodies reacted focally with periportal hepa tocytes and bile ducts in both PBC and controls. However, anti-LA produced much stronger focalized staining of the bile ducts of diseased liver. This study suggests that while anti-TFA antibody recognizes lipoic acid-linked e nzymes and proteins, the epitope recognized differs from that of anti-LA an tibody and PBC autoantibodies. It is unlikely that a response to TFA is the triggering event in PBC. Anti-LA antibodies share a higher degree of simil arity to PBC sera providing suggestive evidence that anti-LA antibodies or anti-LA like antibodies (mimotopes) may help define the initiator of the au toimmune response. (C) 2000 Academic Press.