For the execution of a certain motor task, a motor strategy is chosen by ea
ch individual among those that are consistent with the structural and funct
ional constraints of his/her locomotor system, and that tends to maximise t
he effectiveness of the motor act. The identification of this strategy allo
ws for the assessment of the individual's functional status. This study aim
ed at identifying the motor strategies adopted for the execution of the sit
-to-stand motor task, at different speeds and initial postures, in a sample
of 35 community-dwelling elders and in a sample of 16 young able-bodied in
dividuals. This was done using a method, least perceivable to the test subj
ect and "economical" for the experimenter, which entailed the recording of
external forces only. A musculo-skeletal system model, based on a telescopi
c inverted-pendulum (TIP) moved by a linear and two rotational muscle-equiv
alent actuators, was then used. Parameters describing the kinematics and dy
namics of these actuators were extracted and submitted to statistical analy
sis. Different motor strategies were identified in the two age groups, as w
ell as associated with both a different initial posture (ankle dorsiflexion
angle) and speed of execution of the motor task. In particular, the elder
group, as compared with the young group, prior to seat-off tended to flex t
he trunk more, thus bringing the CM closer to the base of support, and at a
higher velocity, thus gaining a higher momentum. After seat-off, elders ro
tated the body forward and, only after having brought their CM over the bas
e of support, effectively started elevation. Both global muscular effort an
d coordination effort associated with the achievement of balance and raisin
g were lower. However, maximal speed was also lower. The above results indi
cated that the elders could count on a lower functional reserve than the yo
ung individuals and, from the methodological viewpoint, that the TIP approa
ch is a good candidate for subject-specific functional evaluation in a clin
ical context. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.