M. Solomon et al., Assessment of knowledge of guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis amongst clinicians in a teaching hospital, J HOSP INF, 45(4), 2000, pp. 311-317
A significant minority of instances of endocarditis appear to be the result
of invasive procedures pet-formed in susceptible patients with underlying
cardiac conditions. Absence, or inappropriate administration, of antimicrob
ial prophylaxis could expose the patient to the development of a potentiall
y lethal infection. This study was formulated, therefore, to assess the kno
wledge of guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis among hos
pital-based physicians and surgeons. A multiple choice test was developed,
including: (1) cardiac conditions at increased risk fur development of infe
ction; (2) procedures more likely to be associated with bacteraemia and end
ocarditis; and (3) type and route of antimicrobials prescribed when endocar
ditis prophylaxis is indicated. The quality of the test was determined in s
everal ways. Success was defined as a pass rate of 11 of 18 questions (61%)
. The test was taken by 153 of 251 (60%) physicians employed by the hospita
l; 95 (62%) passed the test. No significant difference in success rates was
found according to ses, professional status or medical school. Internists
performed substantially better (with a pass rate of 41 of 53, 77%) than bot
h paediatricians (13 of 26, 50%, P < 0.05) and surgeons (41 of 74, 55%, P <
0.01). The range of success varied from 100% to 36% according to specialty
(P < 0.001). The mean score was 69 +/- 21 in the study group and 94 +/- 10
in a control group of 20 infectious disease physicians (P < 0.001). In con
clusion, this study demonstrates the need for improved education of hospita
l-based clinicians regarding endocarditis prophylaxis recommendations. (C)
2000 The Hospital Infection society.