Plasma apolipoprotein L concentrations correlate with plasma triglyceridesand cholesterol levels in normolipidemic, hyperlipidemic, and diabetic subjects
Pn. Duchateau et al., Plasma apolipoprotein L concentrations correlate with plasma triglyceridesand cholesterol levels in normolipidemic, hyperlipidemic, and diabetic subjects, J LIPID RES, 41(8), 2000, pp. 1231-1236
Apolipoprotein L is a newly recognized component of human plasma lipoprotei
ns, Mainly associated with apoA-I-containing lipoproteins, it is a marker o
f distinct HDL subpopulations. In an effort to gain inference as to its as
yet unknown function, we studied biological determinants of apoL levels in
human plasma. The distribution of apoL in normal subjects is asymmetric, wi
th marked skewing toward higher values. No difference was found in apoL con
centrations between males and females, but we observed an elevation of apob
, in primary hypercholesterolemia (10.1 vs. 8.5 mu g/mL in control), in end
ogenous hypertriglyceridemia (13.8 mu g/mL, P < 0.001), combined hyperlipid
emia phenotype (18.7 g/mL, P < 0.0001), and in patients with type II diabet
es (16.2 mu g/mL, P < 0.02) who were hyperlipidemic.jlr Significant positiv
e correlations were observed between apoL and the log of plasma triglycerid
es in normolipidemia (0.446, P < 0.0001), endogenous hypertriglyceridemia (
0.435, P< 0.01), primary hypercholesterolemia (0.66, P < 0.02), combined hy
perlipidemia (0.396, P < 0.04), hypoalphalipoproteinemia (0.701, P < 0.005)
, and type II diabetes with hyperlipidemia (0.602, P < 0.01). Apolipoprotei
n L levels were also correlated with total cholesterol in normolipidemia (0
.257, P < 0.004), endogenous hypertriglyceridemia (0.446, P = 0.001), and n
oll-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (0.548, P < 0.02), No signi
ficant correlation was found between apoL and body mass index, age, sex, HD
L-cholesterol or fasting glucose and glycohemoglobin levels. ApoL levels in
plasma of patients with primary cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficie
ncy significantly increased (7.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 5.47 +/- 0.27, P< 0.006).