P. Sorlin et al., Comparison of resin-containing BACTEC (TM) Plus Aerobic/F* medium with conventional methods for culture of normally sterile body fluids, J MED MICRO, 49(9), 2000, pp. 787-791
The sensitivity of culture in Bactec(TM) Plus Aerobic/F* culture vials of b
ody fluids from adult patients at a university hospital was compared with t
hat of conventional culture methods, including enrichment in Schaedler brot
h. Previous antibiotic therapy was recorded at the time of sampling. Analys
is of culture results took account of the clinical significance of isolates
and impact on therapy, Of 336 specimens evaluated, 81 (24%) yielded positi
ve cultures, of which 50 cultures (15%) were considered to be clinically si
gnificant (yielding 71 isolates) and 31 (9%) were considered contaminated.
Of the 71 pathogens, 16 (23%) were isolated in the Bactec system only, wher
eas 13 (18%) grew in conventional media only; 12 of the latter were strict
anaerobes, Among clinically significant positive specimens, 19 (38%) were f
rom patients receiving antibiotic therapy In 27 cases (8% of all specimens
and 54% of significantly positive cultures), the isolation of a pathogen le
d to modification of therapy. Overall, culture in the Bactec system showed
higher sensitivity for the isolation of aerobic micro-organisms than Schaed
ler broth. Most of the difference was due to a better recovery of Streptoco
ccaceae, Additional pathogens found only in resin-containing Bactec media l
ed to 30% of all culture-influenced modifications of empirical therapy. The
se data confirm that culture of normally sterile body fluids frequently yie
lds results that are useful for guiding therapy, Although more costly than
standard enrichment broth, the resin-containing Bactec Plus Aerobic/F* vial
can be advantageous for culture of aerobic pathogens from these specimens,
particularly in patients receiving antibiotic therapy.