Distinguishing between seafloor alteration and fluid flow during subduction using stable isotope geochemistry: examples from Tethyan ophiolites in the Western Alps

Citation
Ja. Miler et I. Cartwright, Distinguishing between seafloor alteration and fluid flow during subduction using stable isotope geochemistry: examples from Tethyan ophiolites in the Western Alps, J METAMORPH, 18(5), 2000, pp. 467-482
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF METAMORPHIC GEOLOGY
ISSN journal
02634929 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
467 - 482
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-4929(200009)18:5<467:DBSAAF>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Large amounts of fluid, bound up in the hydrated upper layers of the ocean crust, are consumed at convergent margins and released in subduction zones through devolatilization. The liberated fluids may play an integral role in subduction zone processes, including the generation of arc-magmas. However , exhumed subduction zone rocks often record little evidence of large-scale fluid flow, especially at deeper levels within the subduction zone. Basalt ic pillows from the high-pressure Corsican and Zermatt-Saas ophiolites show a range of delta(18)O values that overall reflect seafloor alteration prio r to subduction However, comparison between the delta(18)O values of the co res and rims of the pillows suggests that the delta(18)O values of the pill ow rims at least have been modified during subduction and high-pressure met amorphism. Pillows that have not undergone high-pressure metamorphism gener ally have rims with higher delta(18)O values than their cores, whereas the converse is the case in pillows that have undergone high-pressure metamorph ism. This reversal in the core to rim oxygen isotope relationship between u nmetamorphosed and metamorphosed pillows is strong evidence for fluid-rock interaction occurring during subduction and high-pressure metamorphism. How ever, the preservation of different delta(18)O values in the cores and rims of individual pillows and within and between different pillows suggests th at fluid flow within the subduction zone was strongly channelled. Resetting of the delta(18)O values in the pillow rims was probably due to fluid-host ed diffusion that occurred over relatively short time-scales (<1 Myr).