Past researchers (A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. E. Martin, & M. H. Tonry, 1983
; A. Von Hirsch & H. Gross, 1981) have explored legal variables and demonst
rated the significance of various criteria (e.g., criminal's prior record,
seriousness of offense, influence of victim) on the sentencing of criminals
. Affect control theory (D. R. Heise, 1979) focuses on inferences about the
identity of the criminal. In the present study, the author examined the in
fluence of the foregoing legal variables and affect control theory in sente
ncing decisions by using U.S. undergraduates' reactions to statements of cr
iminals and of victims. Results of a 2 (criminal's emotion: sad vs. unconce
rned) x 2 (victim's emotion: sad vs. unconcerned) x 2 (prior record: none v
s. auto theft) factorial design supported affect control theory and demonst
rated the significance of the victim's perceived identity in sentencing dec
isions, even when information about the prior record was provided.