We have examined the minimum realtime transmission speed for video-angiogra
phy with the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) with respect to
spatial and contrast resolution. An SLO fluorescein video-angiography sequ
ence was recorded using high-quality media and relayed to a remote site at
transmission speeds ranging from T3 (4.5 Mbit/s) to 0.125T (197 kbit/s). Im
ages were compared with each other subjectively by an ophthalmologist and o
bjectively with image processing software. When compared qualitatively ther
e was little difference between the T3 and T1 images. The T1 images scored
well on clarity and contrast, while 0.5 T was satisfactory but inferior to
T1. Transmission speeds below 0.5 T were inadequate. The digital analysis s
howed a slight difference between T3 and T1. We calculated that there was u
p to a 92% loss of resolution at 0.25T and up to a 98% loss at 0.125T. Base
d on our quantitative and qualitative analysis, a T3 line provided the high
est bandwidth and best resolution, as expected. However, 0.5 T gave satisfa
ctory results for realtime consultations and appears to be the minimum spee
d required for ophthalmic purposes, producing few motion artefacts and good
resolution.