Sm. Dirusso et al., An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: Validation for a regional trauma area, J TRAUMA, 49(2), 2000, pp. 212-220
Background: To develop and validate an artificial neural network (ANN) for
predicting survival of trauma patients based on standard prehospital variab
les, emergency room admission variables, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) us
ing data derived from a regional area trauma system, and to compare this mo
del with known trauma scoring systems.
Patient Population: The study was composed of 10,609 patients admitted to 2
4 hospitals comprising a seven-county suburban/rural trauma region adjacent
to a major metropolitan area. The data was generated as part of the New Yo
rk State trauma registry. Study period was from January 1993 through Decemb
er 1996 (1993-1994: 5,168 patients; 1995: 2,768 patients; 1996: 2,673 patie
nts).
Methods: A standard feed-forward back-propagation neural network was develo
ped using Glasgow Coma Scale, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respirat
ory rate, temperature, hematocrit, age, sex, intubation status, ICD-9-CM In
jury E-code, and ISS as input variables. The network had a single layer of
hidden nodes. Initial network development of the model was performed on the
1993-1994 data, Subsequent models were generated using the 1993, 1994, and
1995 data. The model was tested first on the 1995 and then on the 1996 dat
a. The ANN model was tested against Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS
) and ISS using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the c
urve [ROC-A(z)], Lemeshow-Hosmer C-statistic, and calibration curves.
Results: The ANN showed good clustering of the data, with good separation o
f nonsurvivors and survivors. The ROC-A(z) was 0.912 for the ANN, 0.895 for
TRISS, and 0.766 for ISS, The ANN exceeded TRISS with respect to calibrati
on (Lemeshow-Hosmer C-statistic: 7.4 for ANN; 17.1 for TRISS), The predicti
on of survivors was good for both models. The ANN exceeded TRISS in nonsurv
ivor prediction,
Conclusion: An ANN developed for trauma patients using prehospital, emergen
cy room admission data, and ISS gave good prediction of survival. It was ac
curate and had excellent calibration. This study expands our previous resul
ts developed at a single Level I trauma center and shows that an ANN model
for predicting trauma deaths can be applied across hospitals with good resu
lts.