H. Thiede et al., Methadone treatment and HIV and hepatitis B and C risk reduction among injectors in the Seattle area, J URBAN H, 77(3), 2000, pp. 331-345
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE
Drug treatment has the potential to reduce incidence of blood-borne infecti
ons by helping injection drug users (IDUs) achieve abstinence or by decreas
ing the frequency of injection and sharing practices. We studied the associ
ations between retention in methadone treatment and drug use behaviors and
incidence of hepatitis B and C in a cohort of IDUs in the Seattle, Washingt
on, area. Data on IDUs entering methadone treatment at four centers in King
County, Washington, were collected through face-to-face interviews using a
standardized questionnaire at baseline and 12-month follow-up between Octo
ber 1994 and January 1998. Blood specimens were obtained and tasted for hum
an immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B and C. Drug treatment statu
s at follow-up was analyzed in relation to study enrollment characteristics
and potential treatment outcomes, including injection risk behaviors, cess
ation or reduced frequency of injection, and incidence of hepatitis B and C
. Of 716 IDUs, 292 (41%) left treatment, 198 (28%) disrupted (left and retu
rned) treatment, and 226 (32%) continued treatment throughout the 1-year fo
llow-up period. Compared to those who left treatment, subjects who disrupte
d or continued were less likely to inject at follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 0
.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.7; and OR = 0.1, 95% CI 0.1-0.2, respectively). Among the
468 (65%) subjects who continued injecting, those who continued treatment i
njected less frequently, were less likely to pool money to buy drugs (OR =
0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8) and inject with used needles (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.8
) compared to those who left treatment. Cooker or cotton sharing was not as
sociated with retention in treatment, but hepatitis B incidence was lowest
among those who continued treatment. The results of this study suggest drug
use risk reduction is more likely to be achieved by those who remain in dr
ug treatment and by those who stop injecting, but that those who drop out a
nd return and those who continue to inject while in treatment may also bene
fit. This supports the role of consistent drug treatment in an overall harm
-reduction strategy.