Characterization of chemokine receptor utilization of viruses in the latent reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Citation
T. Pierson et al., Characterization of chemokine receptor utilization of viruses in the latent reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus type 1, J VIROLOGY, 74(17), 2000, pp. 7824-7833
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
0022538X → ACNP
Volume
74
Issue
17
Year of publication
2000
Pages
7824 - 7833
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-538X(200009)74:17<7824:COCRUO>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Latently infected resting CD4(+) T cells provide a long-term reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and are likely to represent the major barrier to virus eradication in patients on combination antiretrovir al therapy. The mechanisms by which viruses enter the latent reservoir and the nature of the chemokine receptors involved have not been determined. To evaluate the phenotype of the virus in this compartment with respect to ch emokine receptor utilization, full-length HIV-1 env genes were cloned from latently infected cells and assayed functionally. We demonstrate that the m ajority of the viruses in the latent reservoir utilize CCR5 during entry, a lthough utilization of several other receptors, including CXCR4, was observ ed. No alternative coreceptors were shown to be involved in a systematic fa shion. Although R5 viruses are present in the latent reservoir, CCR5 was no t expressed at high levels on resting CD4(+) T cells. To understand the mec hanism by which R5 viruses enter latent reservoir, the ability of an R5 vir us, HIV-1 Ba-L, to infect highly purified resting CD4(+) T lymphocytes from uninfected donors was evaluated. Entry of Ba-L could be observed when viru s was applied at a multiplicity approaching 1. However, infection was limit ed to a subset of cells expressing low levels of CCR5 and markers of immuno logic memory. Naive cells could not be infected by an R5 virus even when ch allenged with a large inoculum. Direct cell fractionation studies showed th at latent virus is present predominantly in resting memory cells but also a t lower levels in resting naive cells. Taken together, these findings provi de support for the hypothesis that the direct infection of naive T cells is not the major mechanism by which the latent infection of resting T cells i s established.