A ROBUST method for fitting peculiar velocity field models

Citation
S. Rauzy et Ma. Hendry, A ROBUST method for fitting peculiar velocity field models, M NOT R AST, 316(3), 2000, pp. 621-630
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00358711 → ACNP
Volume
316
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
621 - 630
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8711(20000811)316:3<621:ARMFFP>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
We present a new method for fitting peculiar velocity models to complete fl ux limited magnitude-redshift catalogues, using the luminosity function of the sources as a distance indicator. The method is characterized by its rob ustness. In particular, no assumptions are made concerning the spatial dist ribution of sources and their luminosity function. Moreover, selection effe cts in redshift are allowed. Furthermore the inclusion of additional observ ables correlated with the absolute magnitude - such as for example rotation velocity information as described by the Tully-Fisher relation - is straig htforward. As an illustration of the method, the predicted IRAS peculiar velocity mode l characterized by the density parameter beta is tested on two samples. The application of our method to the Tully-Fisher Mark III MAT sample leads to a value of beta = 0.6 +/- 0.125, fully consistent with the results obtaine d previously by the VELMOD and ITF methods using similar data sets. Unlike these methods, however, our method makes very conservative use of the Tully -Fisher information. Specifically, we are not required to assume either the linearity of the Tully-Fisher relation or a Gaussian distribution of its r esiduals. Moreover, the robustness of the method implies that no Malmquist corrections are required. A second application is carried out, using the fluxes of the IRAS 1.2-Jy sa mple as the distance indicator. In this case the effective depth of the vol ume in which the velocity model is compared with the data is almost twice t he effective depth of the Mark III MAT sample. The results suggest that the predicted IRAS velocity model, while successful in reproducing the cosmic flow locally, fails to describe the kinematics on larger scales.