Should nuclear medicine physicians give the results of radioisotope examinations directly to patients?

Authors
Citation
M. Tondeur et H. Ham, Should nuclear medicine physicians give the results of radioisotope examinations directly to patients?, NUCL MED C, 21(8), 2000, pp. 781-783
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN journal
01433636 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
781 - 783
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-3636(200008)21:8<781:SNMPGT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Patients often ask for the results after a radioisotope procedure, which ca n make nuclear medicine physicians feel uncomfortable. In Belgium, nuclear medicine physicians are not supposed to disclose results directly to patien ts, but to send them to the referring physician. We undertook this work to determine the official rules and practical attitudes in other countries. An introductory letter and a questionnaire were sent to 103 eminent nuclear m edicine specialists from 37 countries. Seventy responses (32 countries) wer e received. Official rules seemed to exist in only seven countries. Most of the respondents indicated that their attitude depended on the clinical sit uation and the results of the test. Many respondents emphasized that, while in some situations the results should be communicated directly to patients in order to initiate treatment rapidly, in other situations, such as cance r, the referring physician was better suited to disclose the results. The a dvantages and drawbacks of different attitudes are discussed. Practically a nd universally applicable rules are difficult to establish, but choosing on e solution remains preferable to no standardized attitude at all. An offici al body, including the medical community, representatives of the population and legal experts, should define an official rule which should be widely c ommunicated, stressing its advantages and drawbacks. In practice, all nucle ar medicine physicians would have to do would be to stick to the rule. ((C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins).