Depomedroxyprogesterone-induced hypoestrogenism and changes in vaginal flora and epithelium

Citation
L. Miller et al., Depomedroxyprogesterone-induced hypoestrogenism and changes in vaginal flora and epithelium, OBSTET GYN, 96(3), 2000, pp. 431-439
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00297844 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
431 - 439
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(200009)96:3<431:DHACIV>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: To identify the effects of depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA ) on vaginal microbial flora and epithelium. Methods: Women who desired DMPA for contraception were evaluated before and at 3 and 6 months after initiation of 150-mg DMPA injections every 3 month s. At each visit, we assessed genital symptoms, vaginal signs, vaginal micr oflora, and histopathology by vaginal biopsies. Results: Among 38 women observed for 6 months, there was significant reduct ion in mean serum estradiol level (99.9 +/- 9.3 pg/mL to 26.6 +/- 1.6 pg/mL , P < .001). The number of subjects with any Lactobacillus did not change, but the number with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-positive Lactobacillus decreas ed from 20% before to 12% after 6 months of DMPA (P = .005). The log concen tration in colony-forming units per milliliter of vaginal fluid of H2O2-pos itive Lactobacillus decreased in a linear manner from 4.0 +/- 0.6 at baseli ne to 2.5 +/- 0.6 after 6 months of DMPA use (P = .006). The mean number of cell layers in the epithelium was reduced slightly from 28.1 +/- 0.7 to 25 .9 +/- 0.9 (P = .05), epithelial thickness decreased from 1.02 +/- 0.04 mm to 0.89 +/- 0.05 mm (P = .005), and the glycogen-positive thickness decreas ed from 0.81 +/- 0.04 mm at baseline to 0.66 +/- 0.05 after 6 months of DMP A use (P = .005). Conclusion: Depomedroxyprogesterone acetate produced a systemic hypoestroge nic state associated with decreased H2O2-positive Lactobacillus colonizatio n and slight thinning of the glycogen vaginal epithelial layer. Such change s possibly compromise the vaginal barrier to infection. (Obstet Gynecol 200 0;96:431-9. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolog ists.).